home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- There's been lot's of discussion of late about all the wonderful
- things we can put in HTML, to make it do this, or that, or the other
- wonderful feature. To format or not to format. Include images.
- Include tables. Include widgets. Sound, movies, sensaround, free
- food, etc.
-
- I really think we're going the wrong way here. HTML was always meant
- to be a small, even minimal document type. The promised strong point
- of the web would be multiple document types, all tied together within
- a structure of HTML documents.
-
- HTML only provides the framework by which lots of other document types
- are accessed. You want to do lot's of neat TeX things? Use TeX. You
- want to do something with integrated text and graphics? Use Postscript.
- You want to define a single document as a collection of different
- things? MIME does this for you. On the other hand, if we make it a
- de facto requirement that everything available thru the web must be
- HTML, I think we limiting ourselves severely (and being somewhat
- egotistical).
-
- MIME is supposed to be where all of our work is going right now. By
- developing a good MIME document viewer, and a good transport mechanism,
- we can do all this (and come up with interface to read MIME mail and news
- while we're at it). And we set up a system which can be easily extended
- to document types that haven't even been designed yet.
-
- Last, let me make another pitch for HTPS. HyperText PostScript. HTML
- provides the structure, and other document types provide the data. But
- sometimes it'd be nice to have the structure and the data all together.
- It would be trivial to add an operator to postscript which defines anchors
- as arbitrary paths associated with URLs. That should satisfy most anyone's
- desire for arbitrarily composed documents. If anyone is interested in
- implementing this, contact me, I have some good ideas.
-
- tom
-
-